ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) versus Collagen Membrane in Accelerating Healing after Mandibular Third Molar Extractions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Removing impacted third molars in the lower jaw can often cause problems, such as pain, swelling, and slow regrowth of tissue. Postoperative healing is often improved using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and collagen membranes. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients needing the removal of bilateral mandibular third molars were randomly assigned to the two groups (30 patients in each group). Group A used PRF put into the extraction socket, and Group B placed a collagen membrane. Pain (based on visual analog scale), swelling (measured), and soft tissue healing (using the Landry's healing index) were compared on the 3 Results: On the third day, the pain score was lower on average in the PRF group (3.2) than in the collagen group (4.5). In Group A, the swelling was lower (4.1 ± 0.6 mm) compared to Group B (5.6 ± 0.9 mm). By the fourteenth day, tissues in the PRF group (4.6 ± 0.4) scored higher for healing, proving they healed faster compared to the collagen group (3.9 ± 0.6) ( Conclusion: During the first few days after having third molar teeth removed, patients who used PRF experienced better pain management, a reduction in swelling, and swifter healing of the tissues than those who used collagen membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.