ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Minimum Set of Investigations Required for Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Low Resource Setting.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) belongs to the most common gynecological disorders that largely affect the health of women, especially living in low-resource countries. Efficiency and effectiveness in assessment of AUB is essential to make sure that appropriate and differed treatment is provided. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective study undertaken in one of the low resource healthcare facilities within a span of six month. Two hundred women were selected with the case of AUB. Evaluation procedure comprised of having a full medical history, physical examination, complete blood count (CBC), pelvic ultrasound, endometrial biopsy, and the serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). The effectiveness and cost efficiency of these studies were also reviewed in order to establish the minimum combination that can be used. Results: The so-called basic set of investigations worked well with 150 (75%) of the 200 participants: 150 (75%) AUB was effectively assessed with the help of medical history, physical examination, CBC, and ultrasound of the pelvis. Diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy required diagnosis of endometrial biopsy in 40 (20) cases. TSH levels in the serum were critical in determining the dysfunction of the thyroid in 10 (5%) incidences. The analysis of the cost demonstrated that omitting endometrial biopsy and TSH testing in a first-line assessment protocol lowered the expenses by 30%, without impairing the accuracy regarding the diagnosis in most of the patients. Conclusion: The triage of AUB in the low-resource environment could be successfully addressed with a minimal number of investigations, which could involve the medical history, physical examination, CBC, and pelvic ultrasound. Endometrial biopsy and TSH level must remain as a test with special clinical indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.