ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Effects of Premolar Extraction on the Dimensions of the Airway Through Cephalometric Appraisal: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, there has been a great deal of interest in research because of the changes that the extraction of premolars has caused to the structures surrounding of the upper airway. This is because it's thought that these therapies could have unforeseen detrimental effects on a patient's ability to breathe or put them at risk for diseases like obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Nevertheless, no research has looked into how the upper airway's dimensions are affected when a second premolar is extracted as part of orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out on the available Pre- and Post- orthodontic treatment records (Lateral cephalograms) in order to find the effect of upper and lower premolar extractions in orthodontic treatment, on the pharyngeal airway space. The statistical sample size was determined to be 80 patients whose radiographs were obtained from the archives of the Institution. Results: Our study showed a significant increase in airway space where there was a loss in anchor and no or minimal change with maximum anchorage. Conclusion: The findings in our study suggest that anchor loss after extraction significantly impacts PAS and skeletal parameters, potentially influencing airway dynamics and skeletal relationships. Further research is necessary to elucidate the medical implications of these changes and their long-term effects on patient outcomes in orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.