ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Closing the Learning Gap in Arthroscopy: A Comparison of Conventional Training and Virtual Reality Simulation.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic simulator training compared to conventional training in enhancing arthroscopic skills among novice orthopedic residents. Material and methods: In this single-center study, 30 orthopedic residents with no arthroscopy experience were randomized into simulator-based (E) or conventional (C) training groups. Group E completed 10 sessions each on basic and diagnostic simulator modules; Group C trained through supervised live surgery. All were evaluated using the simulator, and performance scores were compared. Results: The experimental group outperformed the control group, demonstrating significantly better structure visualization (14 vs. 13.53, Conclusions: Virtual-reality simulator training offers orthopedic residents a safe, controlled way to build essential skills, improving visualization, scope alignment, tissue handling, and efficiency-supporting its integration into residency programs for better-prepared surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.