Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522988›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

A Comparative Evaluation of Different Intraorifice Barriers; Resin Modified Glassionomer Cement, Fiber Reinforced Composite, Cention-N, Biodentine on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots Obturated with Gutta-percha: An

L J Deepika Nair, Faisal M A Gaffoor, Rethi Gopakumar, C Sabari Girish, S Soumya, Aiswarya Gopinath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L J Deepika NairDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Faisal M A GaffoorDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Rethi GopakumarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
C Sabari GirishDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
S SoumyaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Aiswarya GopinathDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontically treated teeth are more susceptible to fracture. The intraorifice barrier is an effective treatment used in endodontically treated teeth by introducing an additional material into the canal orifice immediately after removal of the coronal portion of gutta-percha and sealer. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of using different intraorifice barriers, RMGIC, FRC, CENTION-N, and Biodentine on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots obturated with gutta-percha. Materials and Methods: Conclusion: The FRC group exhibits the highest compressive strength, followed by Cention N, Biodentine, RMGIC, and Control. The post-hoc test highlights specific group differences, with FRC showing significantly higher compressive strength than other materials, particularly the Control, RMGIC, and Biodentine groups.

Indexed as

AH plus sealerBiodentineCention NFiber reinforced compositeIntraorifice barrierResin modified GICUniversal Testing Machine (UTM)

Identifiers

PMID41522988
PMCPMC12788422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.