ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The long-term success of endodontic treatment is significantly influenced by the sealing ability of the obturation technique used to prevent microbial leakage. Various obturation techniques aim to achieve an impervious seal, but the efficacy of these techniques in preventing microbial penetration remains controversial. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars were decoronated and prepared using the ProTaper Universal rotary system. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups ( Results: TIGP exhibited the least microbial leakage (mean leakage time = 49.8 ± 5.3 days), followed by WVC (44.3 ± 6.7 days), and CLC (32.5 ± 7.9 days). The differences were statistically significant ( Conclusion: Thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha showed superior resistance to microbial leakage compared to cold lateral and warm vertical compaction techniques. These findings support its use in clinical practice to enhance the longevity of root canal treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.