ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Masticatory Efficiency with Implant-Supported Overdentures Versus Conventional Dentures.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tooth loss significantly affects oral function and quality of life. While conventional complete dentures (CDs) have long been the standard treatment for edentulous patients, implant-supported overdentures (IODs) offer improved retention, stability, and function. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 completely edentulous patients aged between 50 and 75 years were enrolled in this comparative study. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A ( Results: Patients in the IOD group (Group B) reported significantly higher satisfaction scores (mean = 45.2 ± 3.1) compared to the CD group (mean = 36.7 ± 4.5), Conclusion: IODs provide superior patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency compared to conventional CDs. They significantly enhance oral function and quality of life for edentulous individuals and should be considered a preferred treatment option when feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.