ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Assessment of Clinical Performance of Intraorally Scanned and Direct Metal Laser Sintered Band and Loop Space Maintainer-A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary teeth serve as the best space maintainer for permanent dentition. However, in cases with premature loss of primary teeth, the best way to prevent future malocclusion would be to place an effective space maintainer. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of intraorally scanned and direct metal laser sintered (DMLS) band and loop space maintainers in terms of survival rate, gingival health, and patient satisfaction. Materials and Methodology: In this pilot study, 10 children aged between 4 and 9 years who met the inclusion criteria were selected. Intraoral scanning was performed, and a 3D cast was printed, on which a band and loop space maintainer was fabricated. The printed band and loop were cemented and evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patient satisfaction was assessed at baseline. Data were subjected to statistical analysis using the Friedman test. Result: The survival rate showed a statistically significant improvement over time, with mean scores increasing from 1.20 at baseline to 2.0 at 6 months ( Conclusion: The findings highlight 3D printing as a promising advancement in pediatric dentistry, combining superior performance with enhanced patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.