ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Tools for Accurate Detection and Classification of Oral Lesions: A Clinical Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early detection and accurate classification of oral lesions are essential for effective clinical management and prevention of malignant transformation. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of diagnostic tools aimed at enhancing clinical decision-making. Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted involving 180 patients presenting with suspicious oral lesions at a tertiary dental care center. Digital images of lesions were captured and analyzed using an AI-powered diagnostic software trained on a dataset of over 10,000 labeled images. Each case was also evaluated by two oral pathologists, followed by histopathological confirmation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Cohen's kappa coefficient were calculated to assess diagnostic concordance. Results: The AI system achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.1% (±4.3), sensitivity of 93.6%, and specificity of 89.2%. The concordance between AI and histopathological diagnosis was substantial (κ =0.83; Conclusion: The AI-based diagnostic tool demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and substantial agreement with histopathological findings. It shows promise as a chairside adjunct to enhance clinical decision-making and early detection of potentially malignant oral lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.