ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparison Between the Long-Term Survival Rates of Tooth Preservation and Dental Implants: An
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aetiology of early implant failure: a scoping review.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The long-term prognosis of natural teeth and dental implants has been a critical subject in restorative dentistry. While dental implants offer a predictable solution for missing teeth, preserving natural dentition is often preferred when feasible. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 participants aged between 25 and 65 years were enrolled in this prospective Results: After a 10-year follow-up, the overall survival rate was 88% for preserved natural teeth and 92% for dental implants. Group A showed failures primarily due to vertical root fractures and recurrent periodontal infections, while Group B experienced failures due to peri-implantitis and biomechanical overload. The difference in survival was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: Tooth preservation and dental implants demonstrated similar long-term survival rates in this study. Preserving natural dentition remains a viable and effective option when clinical conditions permit, with dental implants serving as a reliable alternative when tooth retention is unfeasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.