ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Medical brain drain in Nepal: A policy analysis of a deepening health equity crisis.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Producing Mobility, Withholding Authority: Epistemic Drain and Nursing Sovereignty in Nepal.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accelerating exodus of physicians from Nepal threatens to dismantle its public health system, creating a profound crisis in health equity. Annually, the number of physicians seeking to emigrate now rivals the number of new graduates, neutralizing national investment in medical education. This trend has resulted in extreme disparities, with physician-to-population ratios ranging from 1:850 in urban Kathmandu to a catastrophic 1:150,000 in remote districts, and vacancy rates for general practitioners exceeding 62% nationwide. Applying a structured policy-analysis approach based on the 'context-content-actors-process' framework, this perspective connects these outcomes to failures in recruitment cycles, postings and transfers, workplace safety, and financing within Nepal's existing Human Resources for Health policy, including remote-area allowances and service requirements under the Health Service Act, bonded service linked to Nepal Medical Council registration, the Human Resources for Health Strategy 2021-2030, and the 2022 ordinance on the safety and security of health workers. Conventional retention measures are necessary but insufficient. Two complementary pillars are proposed. First, operationalize 'brain circulation' by transforming the Brain Gain Center from a registry into a delivery platform that enables credentialed tele-consultations integrated into referral networks, virtual residency and mentorship with competency credit, and targeted continuing professional development aligned to documented service gaps. Second, establish shared-responsibility financing through bilateral tax-sharing agreements that remit a negotiated portion of income tax paid by Nepali physicians in high-income countries to a ring-fenced 'Health Workforce Sustainability Fund', with disbursements tied to reductions in rural vacancies and safer working conditions and aligned with the World Health Organization Global Code of Practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.