ArticleNAR cancer2026
Targeted CRISPR knockout screening identifies known and novel chemogenomic interactions between DNA damaging agents and DNA repair genes.
Article in NAR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Homologous Recombination Deficiency via the Repositioned Prodrug CB1954.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic instability is a hallmark of cancer, often arising from mutations to DNA damage repair and response (DDR) genes. Classical genetic, biochemical, and structural approaches elucidated the foundational mechanisms of DDR pathways and provided a scientific understanding of their involvement in repair of lesions induced by broad classes of DNA-damaging agents (DDAs). However, given the chemical diversity of DDAs and resultant DNA lesions, along with the multitude of interconnected DDR factors, the chemogenomic landscape of DDA-DDR interactions remains incompletely mapped. To this end, we developed a DDR-targeted, CRISPR knockout screening approach and assessed relationships amongst 353 DNA repair genes and 15 DDAs in LN229 glioma cells. Within this dataset of 5295 DDR-related chemogenomic interactions, we identified many established interactions and discovered novel ones. For example, we observed a specific role of transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair in the repair of adducts generated by monofunctional alkylating agents, a role for the Fanconi anemia pathway in addressing methyl lesions, overt differences in DSB repair following treatment with topoisomerase I versus II poisons, and repair dependencies associated with the imidazotetrazines temozolomide, mitozolomide, and KL-50. Future directions will continue to investigate the mechanisms of novel chemogenomic interactions that we have uncovered as well as work to identify chemogenomic interactions amenable to clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.