Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522770›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2026

Use of a Standardized Patient Team Experience to Improve Student Interprofessional Collaboration and Teamwork.

Jennifer L Griffith, Tamara Burlis, Kate Gershwin, Janice Hanson, Lauren E Milton, Rachel Moquin, Emily Somerville, Amy M Tiemeier, Heather Hageman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer L GriffithAssociate Professor, Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-626X
Tamara BurlisProfessor, Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Kate GershwinProgram Manager, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Janice HansonProfessor, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Lauren E MiltonAssistant Professor, Occupational Therapy Program, Hawai'i Pacific University-Las Vegas Campus.
Rachel MoquinAssociate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Emily SomervilleAssistant Professor, Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Amy M TiemeierAssociate Professor, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis.
Heather HagemanDirector, Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education, Washington University Medical Campus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Standardized patient (SP) simulations are an important component of interprofessional education, fostering collaboration among students. The standardized patient team experience (SPTE) was developed for medical, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, and physical therapy students to simulate care planning for a patient poststroke. Admission or discharge scenarios of same case are used depending on professions participating, enhancing role-specific learning. Methods: Twelve SPTE sessions occurred over two academic years (August 2022-June 2024). Participants included students from each profession who had completed stroke management curriculum. Student teams developed interprofessional admission or discharge plans during 90-minute structured SP encounters. Facilitated debriefing emphasized communication, role delineation, and collaborative decision-making. Postsession surveys assessed students' attitudes toward interprofessional teams, perceived achievement of learning objectives, and satisfaction. Facilitator surveys assessed perceptions of their training's effectiveness and recommendations for improvements. Results: Surveys were collected from 905 participants and fully completed by 736 students. Responses indicated positive attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration. Overall, 91% of students reported satisfaction with the SPTE. Satisfaction varied by profession but not by case scenario. Facilitator survey respondents expressed confidence in leading SPTE sessions but recommended improvements to training, particularly in structured feedback delivery. Discussion: The SPTE fosters appreciation of interprofessional collaboration in patient care. While most students reported satisfaction, variability by profession suggests tailored experiences may optimize engagement. Future iterations will refine facilitator training and explore team composition's influence on student experience. We hope these detailed SPTE instructions enable other institutions to incorporate a similar activity in their programs.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPatient SimulationStudents, Health OccupationsCurriculumHumansInterprofessional EducationSurveys and QuestionnairesInterprofessional EducationStandardized Patient

Identifiers

PMID41522770
PMCPMC12783364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.