ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2026
Use of a Standardized Patient Team Experience to Improve Student Interprofessional Collaboration and Teamwork.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Standardized patient (SP) simulations are an important component of interprofessional education, fostering collaboration among students. The standardized patient team experience (SPTE) was developed for medical, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, and physical therapy students to simulate care planning for a patient poststroke. Admission or discharge scenarios of same case are used depending on professions participating, enhancing role-specific learning. Methods: Twelve SPTE sessions occurred over two academic years (August 2022-June 2024). Participants included students from each profession who had completed stroke management curriculum. Student teams developed interprofessional admission or discharge plans during 90-minute structured SP encounters. Facilitated debriefing emphasized communication, role delineation, and collaborative decision-making. Postsession surveys assessed students' attitudes toward interprofessional teams, perceived achievement of learning objectives, and satisfaction. Facilitator surveys assessed perceptions of their training's effectiveness and recommendations for improvements. Results: Surveys were collected from 905 participants and fully completed by 736 students. Responses indicated positive attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration. Overall, 91% of students reported satisfaction with the SPTE. Satisfaction varied by profession but not by case scenario. Facilitator survey respondents expressed confidence in leading SPTE sessions but recommended improvements to training, particularly in structured feedback delivery. Discussion: The SPTE fosters appreciation of interprofessional collaboration in patient care. While most students reported satisfaction, variability by profession suggests tailored experiences may optimize engagement. Future iterations will refine facilitator training and explore team composition's influence on student experience. We hope these detailed SPTE instructions enable other institutions to incorporate a similar activity in their programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.