Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522769›Full record

ReviewDiscover conservation2026

An updated review of fish species reintroductions: global lessons to inform future riverine fish conservation in the UK.

Reagan H Pearce, Carl D Sayer, Michael A Chadwick

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Discover conservation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reagan H PearceDepartment of Geography, University College London, (North West Wing), Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2610-0643
Carl D SayerDepartment of Geography, University College London, (North West Wing), Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-4881
Michael A ChadwickDepartment of Geography, King's College London, 40 Bush House (North East Wing, Aldwych), London, WC2B 4BG UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4891-4357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reintroductions are potentially an effective conservation tool in freshwater conservation, including for fishes, where 37% are threatened in Europe alone (Tatár et al. (Tatár et al. in Oryx 514:718-729, 2017)). This review examines general and fish-specific species reintroductions to assess fish species reintroductions as a conservation tool, with a case study focus on the currently extirpated burbot

Indexed as

BurbotConservationFreshwater fishesSpecies reintroductionsTranslocations

Identifiers

PMID41522769
PMCPMC12789211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.