Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522768›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025

Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jahnavi Udaikumar, Sushrut Ingawale, Rithish Nimmagadda, Satwik Kuppili, Vindhya Vasini Lella, Tarun Kumar Suvvari, Abraham Cheloff, Amulya Bellamkonda, Suprabhat Giri, Paul Oberstein and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jahnavi UdaikumarDepartment of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sushrut IngawaleDepartment of Medicine, Frank H Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, USA.
Rithish NimmagaddaDepartment of Medicine, One Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Satwik KuppiliDepartment of Medicine, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Amalapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Vindhya Vasini LellaDepartment of Medicine, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Amalapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Tarun Kumar SuvvariDepartment of Medicine, NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Abraham CheloffDepartment of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Amulya BellamkondaDepartment of Medicine, One Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Suprabhat GiriDepartment of Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.
Paul ObersteinDepartment of Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Aasma ShaukatDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, emphasizing the need for effective later-line therapies. Fruquintinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)1-3 inhibitor, has emerged as a promising option for refractory mCRC. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety, both as monotherapy and in combination with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Online Vendor of International Databases (OVID), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (2010-2025). Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or real-world data on fruquintinib in mCRC after at least two prior therapies. Real-world evidence was included to complement RCT findings, as it captures broader populations, treatment patterns, and outcomes not fully reflected in controlled trial settings. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and event rates were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Fifteen studies were included; 12 qualified for meta-analysis (n=3,703). Fruquintinib improved PFS [HR =0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.35] and OS (HR =0.66; 95% CI: 0.57-0.76) Conclusions: Fruquintinib significantly improves PFS and disease control in refractory mCRC with manageable toxicity. Limitations include heterogeneity across studies, with most conducted in predominantly Chinese cohorts. Further studies should explore optimal combination strategies and biomarker-based selection.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerFruquintinibmeta-analysismetastatic diseasesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41522768
PMCPMC12780613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.