Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522767›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025

The optimal number of lymph nodes examined for rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy.

Kexing Xi, Lin Feng, Tianlei Xu, Lin Zhang, Yuelu Zhu, Hui Fang, Haizeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kexing XiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lin FengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tianlei XuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuelu ZhuDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hui FangDepartment of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Haizeng ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have documented a reduction in the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and the number of metastatic LNs in rectal cancer patients as a consequence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). It is plausible that the current guidelines advocating a specific number of LNs to be examined in rectal cancer surgery may be inappropriate for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of LNs to be examined in rectal cancer patients treated with NCRT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinicopathologic data from rectal cancer patients who underwent NCRT and radical resection at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/National Cancer Center (NCC) from January 2004 to December 2015, as well as patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between January 2010 and December 2015. The optimal cutoff value for the number of examined LNs (ELNs) was determined using the X-tile software. Prognosis was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was employed to identify prognostic risk factors. Results: A total of 6,634 patients were included, comprising 391 patients in the NCC cohort and 6,243 patients in the SEER cohort. In the NCC cohort, there was no significant survival difference between patients with <12 ELNs and those with ≥12 ELNs, with the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 72.0% and 76.5%, respectively (P=0.10). Furthermore, the X-tile software identified 7 as the optimal cutoff value for ELNs. In this cohort, patients with <7 ELNs had a 5-year DFS rate of 65.1%, compared to 76.3% for those with ≥7 ELNs (P=0.03). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the number of ELNs (cutoff value at 7) was the independent prognostic factor for DFS [hazard ratio (HR) =3.255, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.796-5.897, P<0.001]. In the SEER cohort, the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 81.2% for patients with <12 ELNs compared with 83.1% for those with ≥12 ELNs (P=0.10). Among these patients, those with <7 ELNs had a 5-year CSS rate of 79.1%, compared to 83.0% for those with ≥7 ELNs (P=0.04). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that the number of ELNs (cutoff at 7) was an independent prognostic factor associated with CSS (HR =1.606, 95% CI: 1.308-1.970, P<0.001). Conclusions: The optimal minimum number of LNs to be examined in rectal cancer patients treated with NCRT appears to be 7. The current standard of examining ≥12 LNs may be inappropriate. This finding provides valuable insights for determining the appropriate number of ELNs during surgery for rectal cancer patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

neoadjuvant therapynumber of examined lymph nodes (number of ELNs)Rectal cancerSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER database)survival

Identifiers

PMID41522767
PMCPMC12780658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.