ArticleCase reports in surgery2026
Acute Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy Revealing a Wandering Spleen With Infarction: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy Revealing a Wandering Spleen With Infarction: A Case Report.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: Wandering spleen (WS) is a rare condition caused by the absence or laxity of splenic suspensory ligaments, predisposing the spleen to displacement and potential complications. While torsion is the most commonly reported issue, infarction due to vascular compromise is a serious and rare complication, particularly in pregnancy. We present a case of splenic infarction in a WS during pregnancy, emphasizing diagnostic challenges and management strategies. Case Presentation: A 19-year-old primigravida at 5 months of gestation presented with progressively worsening abdominal pain and a palpable right-sided abdominal mass. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), chosen for its safety in pregnancy, confirmed an enlarged, ectopic spleen with infarction and splenic vein thrombosis. Conservative management with anticoagulation and supportive therapy was initially attempted but failed due to worsening pain and clinical deterioration. Surgical intervention was deemed necessary, and a splenectomy was performed. The patient recovered well postoperatively, with fetal well-being maintained throughout. Clinical Discussion: Diagnosing WS in pregnancy is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and limited imaging options. MRI plays a pivotal role in identifying ectopic spleen and assessing vascular compromise. Although torsion is commonly associated with infarction, infarction can occur through other mechanisms such as venous thrombosis or outflow obstruction. Early recognition and timely surgical intervention are essential to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity. Conclusion: WS in pregnancy presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, with infarction posing a significant but underreported risk. MRI is a valuable tool in pregnant patients, allowing safe and accurate diagnosis. A multidisciplinary approach and individualized treatment strategies are essential for optimizing both maternal and fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.