Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522515›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

AVOKE: an open-source toolbox for audiovisual web experiments in jsPsych.

Shreshth Saxena, Jackson Shi, Lauren Fink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shreshth SaxenaDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jackson ShiDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lauren FinkDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As web-based experiments become increasingly popular, the need for advanced, accessible research methods is greater than ever. Existing solutions for designing and building an experiment are often closed source and proprietary, which limits configurability, affordability, and testability. Moreover, inconsistent terminologies, domain-specific coding and documentation, and practices such as open-washing impair the ease of adoption and effective use of these tools by novice researchers and practitioners. To address these shortcomings, we release AVOKE-a collection of free and open source tools for web-based behavioural experiments. AVOKE extends the functionalities of the widely adopted jsPsych library, matching community standards for code reusability and comprehensive documentation. The current release of AVOKE supports temporally-precise presentation of audiovisual media (including generated animations, preloaded files, and external sources like YouTube), as well as the collection of behavioural responses, like keypresses and video capture (

Indexed as

InternetPsychologySoftwareBehaviorHumansPsychological TestsAnimationCalibrationInclusivityJavascriptOnlineRemoteStudiesWeb-basedWebcamYoutube

Identifiers

PMID41522515
PMCPMC12790280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.