Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522503›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Comparative anatomy of the thoracic muscles of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea).

Odair M Meira, Eduardo A B Almeida

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Odair M MeiraDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo A B AlmeidaDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bees exhibit a remarkable anatomical diversity, with phenotypic traits that reflect broad evolutionary patterns and specific adaptations. Understanding these patterns requires examining key anatomical features, such as thoracic musculature, which drives morpho-functional variation and underscores their extensive phenotypic diversity. The thorax (or 'mesosoma,' as it can be referred to in the context of bees and other apocritan Hymenoptera) serves as a power core, housing muscles responsible for leg, wing, and also head and metasomal articulation movements. Despite the role of the thoracic musculature in the flight mechanics of bees, detailed studies are limited to accounts of individual species or small subsets of muscles, with truly comparative analyses being scarce, leaving gaps in understanding muscular variation and phylogenetic significance. To address this, we conducted detailed dissections of 13 species, representing six bee families (Andrenidae, Apidae, Colletidae, Halictidae, Megachilidae, and Melittidae) and three additional apoid wasp taxa (Bembicidae, Crabronidae, Philanthidae), selected to capture a broad range of morphological and phylogenetic diversity. Our results revealed high conservation in mesosomal musculature, with only 16 of 58 muscle groups showing significant variation, primarily in origin points, suggesting a balance between functional constraints and evolutionary flexibility in muscle attachment. Phylogenetically relevant changes were investigated by coding 17 morphological characters, revealing potential synapomorphies for bees or certain lineages. These include the dorsomedial origin of Idlm1 (M. prophragma-occipitalis) in Meliponini, as evident in species such as

Indexed as

ThoraxAnatomy, ComparativeAnimalsBeesPhylogenyApidaeFlightMesosomaMorphologySystematics

Identifiers

PMID41522503
PMCPMC12786119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.