ArticleIEEE journal on flexible electronics2025
A Pilot Human Study on Dual Photoplethysmography for Continuously Monitoring Pulse Wave Velocity and Blood Pressure.
Article in IEEE journal on flexible electronics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension is a leading contributor to cardiovascular disease, stroke, and chronic kidney disease worldwide. However, current blood pressure (BP) monitoring techniques, whether auscultatory, oscillometric, or invasive, are constrained by episodic measurement, user variability, and limited feasibility for real-world, continuous monitoring. These limitations hinder early detection of abnormal BP patterns and long-term cardiovascular risk assessment. This paper presents a noninvasive device based on photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, with calculated Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV), that combines off-the-shelf sensors with an infrared-based dual PPG sensor. The device combines PPG signals and physiological measurements to predict blood pressure comprehensively using machine learning, with initial trials on 25 participants demonstrating promising accuracy with mean differences of 1.1 mmHg for Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), -0.9 mmHg for Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and -0.2 mmHg for Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) compared to standard measurements with the Vicorder device. While primarily tested on a young population, the device shows potential for continuous, real-world BP and PWV monitoring, offering greater usability and accessibility than traditional tonometry- and oscillometry-based devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.