ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
The Clinical Utility of Strength Measures in Predicting Patient Progression Following ACLR.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prognostic indicators of lack of strength progression or poor self-reported function may alter rehabilitation decision-making following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The torque-velocity relationship is a noninvasive measure of muscle function that is altered following ACLR, but its prognostic value has not been explored. Purpose: To compare the torque-velocity relationship of knee extensors (quadriceps) and flexors (hamstrings) between the ACLR and uninvolved limbs and to determine whether the torque-velocity relationship was prognostic of subsequent achievement of satisfactory strength. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Participants following ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone or hamstring autografts completed isokinetic knee extension and flexion at 90°/s and 180°/s bilaterally, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at approximately 5.5 and 8.3 months post-ACLR. The torque-velocity relationship was defined as the difference in torque production across velocities, and relationships were analyzed using 2 × 2 analyses of variance. Binomial logistic regressions were used to determine the association between the torque-velocity relationship, age, sex, and time postsurgery with satisfactory knee extension strength, IKDC, and KOOS at visit 2. Results: This study included 189 participants (22.4 ± 9.3 years; 55.0% female). There were significant increases in the quadriceps torque-velocity relationship from visit 1 (0.22 Nm/kg) to visit 2 (0.34 Nm/kg, Conclusion: Quadriceps torque-velocity relationships of the ACLR limbs increased across time but remained less than uninvolved limbs. Hamstrings torque-velocity relationships remained similar between limbs and across time. These findings indicate that the torque-velocity relationship of the quadriceps changed over time and was predictive of future satisfactory strength. Clinical Relevance: Clinicians may use a greater quadriceps torque-velocity relationship as a positive indication of a patient's ability to achieve satisfactory strength later in rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.