ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
The Use of a Handheld Ultrasound Device to Measure Humeral Retrotorsion in Baseball and Softball Athletes: A Validation Study.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Relative humeral retrotorsion (rHRT) is an osseous adaptation in overhead athletes garnered from repetitive overhead throwing. Accurate measurement of anatomic humeral retrotorsion (aHRT) is important as it aids in the determination of rHRT, which influences glenohumeral range of motion profiles. While computed tomography scans are the gold standard for assessing aHRT, their limited clinical utility has driven interest in accessible alternatives, such as diagnostic ultrasound. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to validate a handheld ultrasound device (HH-US) as a clinically accessible tool to measure aHRT in baseball and softball athletes. It was hypothesized that a HH-US device will be reliable and valid when quantifying aHRT compared with an established benchmark, diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US). Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were collected from collegiate baseball and softball athletes at 2 local universities. Participants were uninjured at the time of testing and over 17 years old. Anatomic HRT was measured bilaterally using both MSK-US (GE Venue Go) and handheld ultrasound (GE Vscan Air) using previously established methods. The intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measure, and minimal detectable change, as well as Bland-Altman plots, were used to assess reliability and agreement between devices, respectively. Results: A total of 93 athletes were included in this study. HH-US had excellent intrarater reliability (ICC Conclusion: Our study showed that HH-US provides a reliable and valid measurement of aHRT in comparison to MSK-US and may be an accessible option for clinicians evaluating overhead athletes. Given its strong agreement with established methods, HH-US offers an efficient and cost-effective alternative to MSK-US when measuring aHRT in baseball and softball athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.