Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522444›Full record

ReviewAIMS microbiology2025

Microbiological quality of drinking water from water dispensers.

Thomas D Hile, Raeann Leal, Stephen G Dunbar, Ryan G Sinclair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas D HileSchool of Science and Health, Crafton Hills College, Yucaipa, CA 92399, USA.
Raeann LealCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Stephen G DunbarMarine Research Group, Loma Linda University, CA 92350 USA.
Ryan G SinclairSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of drinking water from sources other than tap water, such as bottled water or water dispenser (WD) machines, is increasing worldwide, driven by consumer preferences for health, convenience, and taste. This trend raises concerns about potential microbial contamination and associated public health risks. In this review, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the scientific literature on microbial contamination in water dispenser machines, evaluate the quality of dispensed water, identify sources of contamination and potential health implications, and propose solutions to mitigate these risks. We conducted a comprehensive search of scientific databases, including PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords related to water dispenser contamination. Abstracts and methods of identified studies were critically appraised to ensure rigorous assessment of microbial contamination. Our analysis of approximately 70 studies revealed that despite consumer perceptions of health benefits, water dispenser machines can harbor higher levels of microbial contamination than the tap water sources supplying them. This review underscores the potential public health risks associated with water dispenser use, and highlights the need for increased vigilance, regular maintenance, and further research to ensure the safety of dispensed water.

Indexed as

contaminantsdisadvantaged communitiesmicroorganismsoutbreakswater-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID41522444
PMCPMC12782947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.