ArticleSocial sciences & humanities open2025
Navigating identity in digital spaces: An exploratory study of social engagement and interactions.
Article in Social sciences & humanities open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Through a focus group approach in an exploratory qualitative study, we aim to understand how engagement on digital platforms varies by social identities including race and ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and religion, and the respondents' response to both positive and negative interactions. Methods: This study involved data collection from six focus groups, two included members of the general population, two focused on the experiences of People of Color (POC), one that included women gamers, and one for all gamers. Participants were asked various questions to aid in the research team's understanding of participants' perceptions of their online experiences with topics including platform engagement, positive and negative online experiences, social connections, identity-based perceptions online (e.g., race and ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and religion), and online protection. Results: The results show that the majority of Black and LGBQ participants report experiencing identity-related discrimination online. Women were more likely to report feeling unsafe while on gaming platforms and more frequently used security measures to conceal their voice, identity, and background to reduce discriminatory experiences. Many study participants reported using social media and gaming platforms to build connections, feel a sense of community, and engage in diverse relationships. Conclusion: This study's findings provide insight into the potential of social media and gaming platforms in promoting self-expression, social connectedness, and a strong sense of community. However, our results also demonstrate the ways in which many digital spaces foster discrimination, harassment, fetishization, and exclusion - all of which can exacerbate negative health outcomes among marginalized individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.