Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522429›Full record

ArticleCartography and geographic information science2026

Practicing community-based research in GIScience and geography - a case study with an Indigenous community, best practices, challenges, and lessons learned.

Yan Lin, Daniel Beene, Theodros Woldeyohannes, Zhuoming Liu, William Tatman, Andee Lister, Xi Gong, Miriam Gay-Antaki, Jani Ingram, Joseph Hoover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartography and geographic information science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yan LinDepartment of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Daniel BeeneDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Theodros WoldeyohannesDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Zhuoming LiuDepartment of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
William TatmanDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Andee ListerDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Xi GongDepartment of Biobehavioral Health and Institute for Computational and Data Sciences (ICDS), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Miriam Gay-AntakiDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Jani IngramDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Joseph HooverDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

UNM Metals Exposure and Toxicity Assessment on tribal Lands in the Southwest (METALS) Superfund Research ProgramP42ES025589 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BOLT, ALICIA M. · 2017 to 2025
$16.4M
Role of open dumping and open burning of solid waste in the generation of microplastics and products of incomplete combustion on tribal landsP50MD015706 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LUO, LI · 2020 to 2024
$6.8M
Pilot Project CoreP30ES032755 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BLOSSOM, SARAH J · 2022 to 2025
$5.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES032755NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES025589NIMHD NIH HHS P50 MD015706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based research (CBR) in geography is increasingly emphasizing participatory approaches that center the voices of local communities in the research process. This shift seeks to move away from extractive research practices by fostering collaborations built on reciprocity and respect - particularly with Indigenous and marginalized groups. At the core of this approach is co-produced knowledge, wherein communities actively shape research priorities, methodologies, and interpretations. Rather than imposing external frameworks, these collaborations recognize the value of local and Indigenous knowledge systems in informing research and driving meaningful outcomes. In this paper, we review contemporary CBR literature in geography and GIScience and present a case study on environmental health concerns related to mining legacies in the U.S. This research, led by GIScience and geospatial experts in collaboration with a Tribal community, illustrates opportunities to advance CBR theory and practice within these fields. As CBR becomes increasingly integrated into GIScience projects, we critically examine the positionality of GIScience researchers in this transition, the challenges they face, and the lessons learned. The paper closes with a discussion of best practices for CBR. While all research involves some degree of extractivism, we explore how CBR can help ensure that communities derive direct and tangible benefits from participation in GIScience and geography research.

Indexed as

Community-based researchcommunity geographyenvironmental healthindigenous populationparticipatory GIS

Identifiers

PMID41522429
PMCPMC12782218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.