ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2026
Why Feminist Participatory Methods Matter for Global Health Research in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why Feminist Participatory Methods Matter for Global Health Research in Sub-Saharan Africa.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research in global health is often framed as centering health equity. However, research and programmatic partnerships are often relationships between institutions and researchers in high-income countries (HICs), and researchers and actors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Such relationships are rife with power dynamics that require thoughtful attention and solutions. Feminist research methods, including perspectives from intersectional and African feminist thinkers, as well as participatory approaches, may offer a means of engaging with power inequities and disrupting often taken-for-granted assumptions in the SSA context. Such epistemological perspectives and methods not only disrupt "traditional" research relationships and challenge unexamined assumptions about knowledge but are also driven by the lived experiences of health disparities in specific, formerly colonized contexts and can therefore lead to context-specific or localized solutions to complex health inequities. This paper explores how these specific feminist research perspectives and methods can challenge power dynamics that are often embedded in global health research and interventions in SSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.