Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522428›Full record

ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2026

Why Feminist Participatory Methods Matter for Global Health Research in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Heather M Tucker, Don Catherine Awuor Ochieng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heather M TuckerCenter For AIDS Prevention University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2565-1996
Don Catherine Awuor OchiengWomen Working with Women (3 W) Kisumu Kenya.

Funding

TRAINEESHIPS IN AIDS PREVENTION STUDIEST32MH019105 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Carol Suzanne Camlin, Glenn-Milo Santos · 1989 to 2026
$15.3M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in global health is often framed as centering health equity. However, research and programmatic partnerships are often relationships between institutions and researchers in high-income countries (HICs), and researchers and actors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Such relationships are rife with power dynamics that require thoughtful attention and solutions. Feminist research methods, including perspectives from intersectional and African feminist thinkers, as well as participatory approaches, may offer a means of engaging with power inequities and disrupting often taken-for-granted assumptions in the SSA context. Such epistemological perspectives and methods not only disrupt "traditional" research relationships and challenge unexamined assumptions about knowledge but are also driven by the lived experiences of health disparities in specific, formerly colonized contexts and can therefore lead to context-specific or localized solutions to complex health inequities. This paper explores how these specific feminist research perspectives and methods can challenge power dynamics that are often embedded in global health research and interventions in SSA.

Indexed as

feministglobal healthmethodsparticipatorypower

Identifiers

PMID41522428
PMCPMC12783689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.