ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Clinical Landscape and Perception of Surgical Neuro Oncology among Neurosurgical Resident Trainees of Pakistan: A Nationwide Analysis.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strengthening Academic Foundations: PINS' Journey Toward Research Excellence.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- An Impressive Advancement in Neuro-Oncology in Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the neurosurgical residents' perspectives on surgical neuro-oncology specialty training in Pakistan. Methodology: A nationwide survey-based observational study was conducted among neurosurgery residents registered with the accredited residency programs in Pakistan. A structured questionnaire assessing knowledge, training, mentorship, and institutional support in surgical neuro-oncology was disseminated via Google Forms (Google Inc., USA). Data collection took place from January to March, 2025 across both public and private sector training institutes. Responses were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, with categorical variables presented as frequencies and percentages and continuous variables as means with standard deviations. Results: A total five hudnred residents were targeted among whom one hundred residents responded, yielding a response rate of 20%. While 90% (90) rated their knowledge of brain and spinal tumors as good or excellent, only 67% (67) felt confident interpreting imaging studies. Notably, 33% (33) had received no formal training in surgical neuro-oncology. Exposure to spinal cord tumor surgeries was limited, with only 14% (14) having participated in such procedures. Mentorship and interdisciplinary collaboration were inadequate; only 20% (20) reported access to dedicated neuro-oncology mentors, and just 12% (12) rated interdepartmental collaboration as excellent. Resources were considered limited or insufficient by 69% (69) of respondents. Despite these challenges, 84% (84) supported the establishment of a dedicated neuro-oncology fellowship, and 67% (67) expressed definite interest in pursuing such training. Conclusion: This nationwide analysis highlights critical insights into the clinical exposure, training quality, and perceptions of neurosurgical residents in Pakistan regarding surgical neuro-oncology. While the majority of residents demonstrated enthusiasm and self-reported strong theoretical knowledge, substantial gaps were identified in hands-on experience, formal training, mentorship, and access to specialized resources, particularly in spinal neuro-oncology. Limited interdisciplinary collaboration and insufficient institutional support further hinder comprehensive skill development. National-level reforms are essential to align with global standards in neurooncological education and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.