Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522308›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025

Methods and early findings from a study comparing next-generation sequencing versus traditional cultures for penile implants concerning for low-grade infection.

Gerard D Henry, Niccole Diaz, Caleb D Phillips, Aaron C Lentz, Paul Perito, Richard Natale, Nelson Bennett, Andrew R Stuart, Caroline J Henry, Paul H Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gerard D HenryWillis-Knighton Advanced Urology Department, Willis-Knighton Bossier Health System, Bossier City, LA, USA.
Niccole DiazClinical Research Department, MicroGenDX Diagnostics, Orlando, FL, USA.
Caleb D PhillipsClinical Research Department, MicroGenDX Diagnostics, Orlando, FL, USA.
Aaron C LentzDepartment of Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Paul PeritoPerito Urology, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Richard NataleCarolina Urology Partners, Concord, NC, USA.
Nelson BennettDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew R StuartWillis-Knighton Advanced Urology Department, Willis-Knighton Bossier Health System, Bossier City, LA, USA.
Caroline J HenryWillis-Knighton Advanced Urology Department, Willis-Knighton Bossier Health System, Bossier City, LA, USA.
Paul H ChungDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial culture is the current standard of care to choose therapeutic antibiotics for infection occurring with inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs). However, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA has proven beneficial for analysis of biofilm composition and relative abundance of specific microorganisms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate whether NGS compared to microbial culture can better guide the management and antibiotic selection and device survival rates. We hypothesize that identifying microbial composition with NGS, as compared with traditional culture, will lead to better therapeutic strategies resulting in improved patient outcomes and device survival. In this present manuscript, we describe the overall study methodology and analyze device survival rates, classify clinical presentations of IPP infections, and determine infected implant microbial composition and antibiotic resistance among an early patient cohort. These early results included 18- to 80-year-old consecutive male patients who received antimicrobial treatment without surgical replacement for at least 7 days since identification of infected IPPs. Subjects were randomized into two analytic arms: traditional culture and NGS. Throughout the study, investigators and patients completed questionnaires to provide data for comparison. To date, of the 9 patients enrolled in the study, 6 eventually underwent device removal due to worsening infection within 7 days of initiating empiric antibiotic treatment. Six patients were seen in a clinic setting, while 3 were seen in the hospital/emergency department: 7 implants were primary, while 2 were secondary. All subjects received a Coloplast IPP but had differing reservoirs and reservoir locations. In cases where penile shaft tenderness was present, the implanted IPP was more often removed within 7 days. In contrast, when no tenderness was reported, the device remained viable for at least 10 days. As of this report, 11 active sites have participated in the study, with ongoing patient enrollment aimed at reaching sufficient sample sizes for statistical comparison. Penile shaft tenderness was a common presentation among patients whose early antibiotic treatment for IPP infection failed. Recruitment of additional patients to this prospective, randomized controlled trial will help to identify favorable presentations of IPP infection. Additional data will allow comparison of implantation outcomes between NGS and traditional culture.

Indexed as

infectionInflatable penile prosthesis (IPP)microbiomenext-generation sequencing (NGS)traditional microbial culture

Identifiers

PMID41522308
PMCPMC12779433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.