ArticleInterspeech
An automatic, simple ultrasound biofeedback parameter for distinguishing accurate and misarticulated rhotic syllables.
Article in Interspeech. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participatory Design: Addressing Speech-Language Pathologists' Challenges through Collaborative Interface Design.Design issues · 2025Article
- Classification of accurate and misarticulated /Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Characterizing accurate vs. misarticulated patterns of tongue movement using ultrasound can be challenging in real time because of the fast, independent movement of tongue regions. The usefulness of ultrasound for biofeedback speech therapy is limited because speakers must mentally track and compare differences between their tongue movement and available models. It is desirable to automate this interpretive task using a single parameter representing deviation from known accurate tongue movements. In this study, displacements recorded automatically by ultrasound image tracking were transformed into a single biofeedback parameter (time-dependent difference between blade and dorsum displacements). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate this parameter as a predictor of production accuracy over a range of different vowel contexts with initial and final /r/ in American English. Areas under ROC curves were 0.8 or above, indicating that this simple parameter may provide useful real-time biofeedback on /r/ accuracy within a range of rhotic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.