ReviewEcology and evolution2026
Environmental DNA (eDNA) Technology in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Health Research: Advances and Prospects.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aquatic predators as complementary tools for mosquito vector control: current evidence, ecological considerations, and future directions.Parasites & vectors · 2026Review
- Review
- Trends in Aquatic Environmental DNA Research in Alaska.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Environmental DNA: From Promise to Practice.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) Technology in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Health Research: Advances and Prospects.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) technology, as a minimally invasive or noninvasive monitoring approach, has been increasingly applied in biodiversity surveys and ecosystem health assessment by detecting genetic material in environmental samples. This approach exhibits high sensitivity for identifying rare, endangered, and invasive species, with broad applicability across aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric ecosystems. Moreover, eDNA metabarcoding enables large-scale detection of microbial community structure and function. By systematically synthesizing multi-environment case studies, this review evaluates optimized eDNA workflows, including sampling (0.22-0.45 μm filtration for aquatic systems, PCI/DNeasy methods for soils, and MD8 samplers for air), DNA extraction, and bioinformatic analysis, integrating standardized guidelines to enhance research reproducibility and comparability. Despite advantages such as reduced field labor and cost efficiency, eDNA applications still face critical challenges, such as reference database gaps, full-process quality control risks, methodological inconsistencies, and limitations in abundance quantification. Future advancements in sequencing technologies, bioinformatics, and interdisciplinary integration (machine learning, remote sensing) are expected to expand eDNA's role in tackling global change issues such as climate adaptation, pollution tracking, and ecological restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.