Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522220›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Generalized Additive Modeling of Ecological Data With mgcv: New Adequacy Assessment Tools.

Julien Mainguy, Rachel McInerney, Russell B Millar, Eliane Valiquette, Martin Bélanger, Rafael de Andrade Moral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Environmental Drivers of Habitat Suitability for Shortbill Spearfish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julien MainguyDirection principale de l'expertise sur la faune aquatique Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs Québec Québec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-5550
Rachel McInerneyDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics Maynooth University Maynooth Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2825-7361
Russell B MillarDepartment of Statistics University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-8721
Eliane ValiquetteDirection principale de l'expertise sur la faune aquatique Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs Québec Québec Canada.
Martin BélangerDirection de la gestion de la faune de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs Rouyn-Noranda Québec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-0150
Rafael de Andrade MoralDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics Maynooth University Maynooth Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-3563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalized additive models (GAMs) are a semi-parametric extension of generalized linear models (GLMs) that allow incorporating different forms of nonlinearities commonly encountered in ecological relationships, thus frequently offering a better statistical description than GLMs in such cases. Due to the use of smooth functions, however, validating that the observed data represent a plausible realization of a fitted GAM according to the underlying distributional assumptions being used is less straightforward than with GLMs. Moreover, if the number of basis dimensions used in smooth terms to control the degree of flexibility is set too large, overfitting can arise despite in-built penalization procedures aimed at preventing excessive wiggliness. Here, we present how GAMs fitted with the mgcv package in R can be assessed for their adequacy based on half-normal plots with a simulated envelope using newly-available helper functions for the hnp package. A proposed metric relying on the mgcViz package is also presented to help detect both under- and overfitting relative to a predictor of interest from a realized coverage perspective. Three fisheries-related examples analyzing continuous data, counts, and discrete proportions are then presented to illustrate the usefulness of these approaches in providing more statistical context for the interpretation of nonlinear ecological relationships.

Indexed as

adjusted deviance explaineddeviance residualshalf‐normal plot with a simulated envelopemgcViz scoreunder‐ and overfitting

Identifiers

PMID41522220
PMCPMC12784473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.