ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Generalized Additive Modeling of Ecological Data With mgcv: New Adequacy Assessment Tools.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental Drivers of Habitat Suitability for Shortbill Spearfish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Generalized Additive Modeling of Ecological Data With mgcv: New Adequacy Assessment Tools.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generalized additive models (GAMs) are a semi-parametric extension of generalized linear models (GLMs) that allow incorporating different forms of nonlinearities commonly encountered in ecological relationships, thus frequently offering a better statistical description than GLMs in such cases. Due to the use of smooth functions, however, validating that the observed data represent a plausible realization of a fitted GAM according to the underlying distributional assumptions being used is less straightforward than with GLMs. Moreover, if the number of basis dimensions used in smooth terms to control the degree of flexibility is set too large, overfitting can arise despite in-built penalization procedures aimed at preventing excessive wiggliness. Here, we present how GAMs fitted with the mgcv package in R can be assessed for their adequacy based on half-normal plots with a simulated envelope using newly-available helper functions for the hnp package. A proposed metric relying on the mgcViz package is also presented to help detect both under- and overfitting relative to a predictor of interest from a realized coverage perspective. Three fisheries-related examples analyzing continuous data, counts, and discrete proportions are then presented to illustrate the usefulness of these approaches in providing more statistical context for the interpretation of nonlinear ecological relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.