ReviewEcology and evolution2026
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Filtering in Population Genomics: Empirical Review and Decision Framework for Improved Practice.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Filtering in Population Genomics: Empirical Review and Decision Framework for Improved Practice.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- ABCA7-80 moderates vascular stiffness-p-tau217 association in older African Americans.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) filtering remains widely used in population genomics, but its application remains inconsistent, often lacking detailed justification, and not always aligned with biological context. To evaluate whether conceptual awareness has translated into methodological change, we review empirical studies citing Pearman et al. (2022), a representative study testing the impacts of different grouping approaches for HWE filtering. While pooled filtering is becoming rare, we found a decreasing but still considerable heterogeneity in the decision of filtering schemes, limited reporting of thresholds, and few explicit justifications for applied approaches. These patterns suggest that awareness of HWE filtering limitations is increasing but has not yet led to consistent practice. We synthesise the biological and technical causes of HWE deviation, review recent advances, including population-aware and structure-informed filtering tools, and propose a transparent decision framework for population genomic studies. Rather than a default quality-control step, HWE filtering should be applied as a hypothesis-aware decision that reflects study aims and biological context. A citation-based mini-survey and decision workflow are provided to support biologically informed and reproducible applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.