ArticleTracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.)2025
Out-of-Pocket Costs and Potential Surprise Bills for Tracheostomy in Commercially Insured Patients.
Article in Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Equity in Tracheostomy Care with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Tracheostomy involves complex, resource-intensive care. Yet, few data about the procedure-related cost burden for patients and their families are available. Passage of the No Surprises Act has been associated with changes in patient billing for certain healthcare services, but data on tracheostomy have not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan database for commercially insured patients aged 18-64 who underwent tracheostomy from 2014-2022 in the United States. We estimated out-of-pocket (OOP) costs (sum of deductibles, copay, and coinsurance) and potential surprise bills (an out-of-network claim where both the primary surgeon and facility were in-network) within 30 days of surgery. Relationships between OOP costs, potential surprise bills, and patient- and system-level exposures were analyzed. Results: Among 8,950 patients who underwent tracheostomy, the mean (SD) age was 49.3 (12.7) years; most patients were male (61.8%) and had fee-for-service based insurance (79.8%). The mean (SD) total OOP cost attributable to tracheostomy was $1,423 (2,029), and coinsurance accounted for 62.8% of these costs. Potential surprise bills were present in 9.1% of surgical episodes overall and were associated with higher OOP costs (mean (SD) $1909 (2433) vs. $1444 (2021); p<0.001)). High-deductible health plans and fee-for-service based plans were the largest predictors for overall OOP costs (cost ratio 2.66 and 1.84, respectively; p<0.001 for both) and potential surprise bills (odds ratio 2.07 and 2.78, respectively; p<0.001 for both). The incidence of potential surprise bills diminished over the course of the study period. Conclusions: Patients undergoing tracheostomy have significant exposure to OOP costs, predominantly attributable to coinsurance, with potential surprise bills representing an additional source of cost exposure. These findings highlight the need for financial counseling and policy reform to reduce patient cost burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.