ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Development of a machine learning-based model to predict prognosis of resected invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IPA) poses a significant threat to global health and patients still experience tumor recurrence and metastasis. This study aimed to construct an optimized prognosis model using machine learning to predict the disease-free survival (DFS) of IPA patients. Methods: A total of 670 resected IPA patients from 2015 to 2020 were enrolled. Clinicopathological information was collected and the outcomes of patients were followed up. Patients were divided into a training set and a test set at a ratio of 4:1. Four machine learning models were compared to build the DFS models and 5-fold cross validation was performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), C-index, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model. Results: Among the four models, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) model showed the best performance in predicting DFS at 2-year (training set: AUC =0.906, test set: AUC =0.862), at 3-year (training set: AUC =0.894, test set: AUC =0.879), at 4-year (training set: AUC =0.901, test set: AUC =0.902), and at 5-year (training set: AUC =0.927, test set: AUC =0.887). The calibration curves and DCA exhibited a good predictive performance. Conclusions: Our study successfully constructed a machine-learning based prognostic model to predict DFS, which may provide oncologists with an effective tool for early medical intervention and survival improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.