Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522127›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Prognostic value of left gastric artery lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Pengjie Yang, Pubo Shi, Ting Yang, Tianlai Liu, Jingjing Zhang, Benben Zhu, Yong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pengjie Yang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital (Inner Mongolia Campus)/Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Pubo Shi *College of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Ting Yang *College of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Tianlai LiuEndoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital (Inner Mongolia Campus)/Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Jingjing ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Benben ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Cancer Hospital (Inner Mongolia Campus)/Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Yong LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignant tumor with high disease burden and poor prognosis. Lymph node (LN) metastasis (LNM) is a key prognostic factor for ESCC patients, particularly left gastric artery lymph nodes (No. 7) metastasis. No. 7 LNs dissection is essential for preventing residual tumor and recurrence. However, research on No. 7 LNM in ESCC remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the independent prognostic role of No. 7 LNM in ESCC and characterize its LNM patterns by comparing isolated No. 7 LNM with No. 7 LNM combined with LNM at other sites. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 144 patients with thoracic ESCC who had undergone radical esophagectomy and dissection of No. 7, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN, No. 106rec), subcarinal (No. 107), and main bronchial (No. 109) LNs at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2019 to 2021. Postoperative follow-up included routine examinations every 3 months for the first 2 years. Lost-to-follow-up cases underwent standard right-censoring, with these data included in the final analysis. Patients were stratified into the No. 7-positive group (No. 7 LN+) and the No. 7-negative group (No. 7 LN-) based on postoperative pathological detection of No. 7 LNM. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with ESCC, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to identify the independent risk factors associated with OS and DFS. Results: Among 144 patients with thoracic ESCC, 75 had lower thoracic tumors, 124 received neoadjuvant therapy, and 115 had pathological stage N0-N1 disease. This study analyzed the association between No. 7 LNM and prognosis in these patients. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly poorer OS (P=0.007) and DFS (P=0.009) in the No. 7 LN+ group than the No. 7 LN- group. Multivariate Cox regression identified No. 7 LNM as an independent factor influencing the OS (P=0.03) and DFS (P=0.04) of patients with ESCC. Subgroup analysis of patients with No. 7 LNM revealed no significant differences in OS (P=0.33) or DFS (P=0.37) between patients with ESCC with and without 106rec LNM. However, patients with concurrent 107 LNM or 109 LNM had significantly poorer OS (P=0.02) and DFS (P=0.03) compared with those without such metastases. Furthermore, lower-thoracic ESCC patients in the No. 7 LN+ group had significantly poorer OS (P=0.04) and DFS (P=0.04) than the No. 7 LN- group. Sensitivity analysis of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy confirmed the results were robust. Conclusions: Our study confirms that No. 7 LNM is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with thoracic ESCC. Standardized dissection of No. 7 LNs is critical during radical esophagectomy for thoracic ESCC.

Indexed as

left gastric artery lymph nodes (No. 7)lymph node metastasis (LNM)membrane anatomy theoryretrospective cohort studyThoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (thoracic ESCC)

Identifiers

PMID41522127
PMCPMC12780381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.