ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025
Surgical strategies for anatomically high-risk CABG scenarios.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-operator endoscopic lesser saphenous vein harvest using retractor-assisted leg suspension.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Clinical Decision-Making and Imaging-Guided Follow-Up Strategies in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- AI-enhanced coronary CTA for optimizing surgical planning in CABG: a new frontier in preoperative assessment?European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the most frequently performed cardiac surgery, yet anatomically complex cases present unique technical challenges that significantly impact outcomes. This review focuses on high-risk CABG scenarios defined by patient-specific anatomical constraints, including porcelain aorta, poor conduits and targets, redo-CABG, spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), and coronary aneurysms. Unlike prior studies emphasizing physiological comorbidities, we highlight how structural complexities alter surgical planning, limit standard techniques, and demand tailored strategies. Perioperative imaging-including computed tomographic angiography and epiaortic scanning-plays a pivotal role in risk stratification and operative planning. For porcelain or atherosclerotic ascending aorta, "no-touch" techniques, axillary cannulation, or hypothermic circulatory arrest and aortic replacement can mitigate embolic risks. Poor conduits and targets necessitate creative revascularization approaches, including composite and sequential grafting and endarterectomy, while redo-CABG requires meticulous sternal re-entry and dissection to avoid injury to cardiovascular structures including patent grafts. SCAD management favors conservative therapy, but surgery is reserved for high-risk anatomies not amenable to percutaneous interventions with substantial myocardial territories at risk, whereas symptomatic and large coronary aneurysms often require complex surgical repair. Across all scenarios, a successful outcome necessitates proper preoperative planning, intraoperative adaptability, and expertise. In this clinical practice review, we shed light on anatomically high-risk CABG cases and present the latest evidence-based and expert-recommended surgical management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.