ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Impacting factors of diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in mediastinal lesions: an analysis with 622 cases.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (UGNB) has been widely adopted in pre-treatment pathological diagnosis in mediastinal neoplasms, while the accuracy rates varied in previous reports. We analyzed the impacting factors of accuracy in this retrospective study, aiming to further improve the diagnostic yield. Methods: Patients with mediastinal lesions who had undergone UGNB in Shanghai Chest Hospital between August 2013 and September 2022 were included in this study. All relevant medical information was retrieved from the database of our institution. The accuracy of biopsy was verified by post-surgery pathology or clinical outcome after long-term follow-up. Potential impacting factors, such as gender, age, tumor size, cystic necrosis, needle gauge and vascularity, were analyzed via binary logistic regression. Results: A total of 622 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 366 males and 256 females with an average age of 45 years old. There were 585 (94.05%) patients who obtained a successful diagnosis after biopsy, with a complication (≥ grade 2) rate of 3.86%. Thymic epithelial tumor (n=295), lymphoma (n=190) and germ cell tumor (n=51) were the most common three types. Cystic necrosis and younger age (<40 years) were tested to be significant impacting factors that lead to unsuccessful diagnosis, with P=0.001 and P=0.02, respectively. Conclusions: UGNB is an effective diagnostic approach for patients with mediastinal tumors with minor complications. Cystic necrosis and younger age were significant impacting factors for unsuccessful diagnosis. New techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and rotational core needle, may probably increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.