ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
The use of energy devices for dividing the cutting plane in sublobectomy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of energy devices for the division of cutting planes in sublobectomy remains controversial, especially in terms of postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this technique in patients undergoing sublobectomy. Methods: A cohort of 69 patients who had received sublobectomy was retrospectively enrolled. The cutting planes were dissected by energy devices without a stapler in all the surgeries. An analysis was conducted of the clinical, pathological, and surgical parameters, along with the postoperative course of recovery. Expansion of the residual lung was evaluated 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results: The average age of the patients was 51.4 years and over three quarters of them were female, non-smokers. All the surgeries were done by uni-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with the mean operation time being 124.9 minutes and an average blood loss of 25.9 mL. The overall complication rate was 13% (9/69), with prolonged air leak being most common (7.2%, 5/69). The mean time of chest tube drainage and hospital stay after surgery was 3.5 and 3.8 days, respectively. Full remnant lung expansion was obtained in 65.1% (41/63) of the patients at three-month follow-up after surgery. At 6-month follow-up, the rate of full lung expansion of the patients rose to 90.5% (57/63). Conclusions: It is safe and feasible to divide the cutting plane by energy devices during sublobectomy for selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.