Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522082›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

The incremental value of invasive coronary angiographic characteristics in predicting the success of retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention via invisible collateral channels.

Qianjun Jia, Tianyu Hu, Yuhao Dong, Yuming Huang, Meiping Huang, Bin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qianjun Jia *Department of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tianyu Hu *Department of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhao DongDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuming HuangDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Meiping HuangDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Guidezilla catheter (Boston Scientific) via invisible septal collateral channels (CCs) has not been extensively investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the incremental value of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) characteristics combined with the Guidezilla catheter for predicting technical success during retrograde CTO PCI through invisible septal CCs. Methods: We analyzed 166 consecutive retrograde CTO PCI procedures performed via invisible septal CCs (with or without the Guidezilla catheter) across 40 centers from January 2019 to December 2022. Clinical, ICA, and procedural characteristics, along with outcomes, were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify technical success predictors, while the discriminatory power of the multivariate model was evaluated via receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The overall technical success rate for CTO PCI via invisible septal CCs was 81.33%. Multivariate analysis identified the following characteristics as independent and significant predictors of technical success via invisible septal CCs: a ratio of the right coronary artery-posterior descending artery length (RCA-PDA length) to the length of the PDA origin to the apex (LOPA) greater than 0.64 [hazard ratio (HR) =6.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.55-14.99; P<0.001] and the use of the Guidezilla catheter (HR =2.42; 95% CI: 1.01-5.79; P=0.048). The combination of RCA-PDA length:LOPA ratio and Guidezilla status demonstrated superior predictive capability [areas under the ROC curve (AUC) =0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.81] compared to the Guidezilla-only model (AUC =0.62; 95% CI: 0.54-0.69; P=0.017). Conclusions: Incorporating the ICA characteristic of the RCA-PDA length:LOPA ratio significantly improved predictive accuracy when compared to the use of Guidezilla catheter status alone. Thus, ICA characteristics provide significant incremental value in predicting technical success when the Guidezilla catheter is applied for retrograde CTO PCI via invisible septal CCs.

Indexed as

Chronic total occlusion (CTO)collateral circulationpercutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs)retrograde approach

Identifiers

PMID41522082
PMCPMC12780567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.