Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522068›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Reducing respiratory artifacts in gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging via a patient-adapted breath-holding training strategy.

Liangrui Fang, Chunyun Chen, Shuyao He, Xiaoyue Zhou, Mengxiao Liu, Zhiwei Zhang, Jun Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liangrui Fang7T Magnetic Resonance Translational Medicine Research Center/Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8923-9197
Chunyun Chen7T Magnetic Resonance Translational Medicine Research Center/Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shuyao He7T Magnetic Resonance Translational Medicine Research Center/Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoyue ZhouMR Research Collaboration Team, Diagnostic Imaging, Siemens Healthineers China, Shanghai, China.
Mengxiao LiuMR Research Collaboration Team, Diagnostic Imaging, Siemens Healthineers China, Shanghai, China.
Zhiwei Zhang *The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun Zhao *7T Magnetic Resonance Translational Medicine Research Center/Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8611-3150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an inadequate breath-holding strategy is an independent risk factor for image quality degradation in single-phase arterial acquisition. Therefore, optimizing breath-holding training protocols is critical. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a nongradual breath training protocol combined with contrast dilution for reducing arterial phase (AP) respiratory artifacts in upper abdomen gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 126 patients (91 males; mean age 52.65±11.07 years) who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced upper abdomen MRI for the first and only time from May 2019 to February 2020. All patients were divided into four groups according to different breath-holding training strategies and contrast injection patterns (group 1: gradual strategy + diluted injection; group 2: nongradual strategy + diluted injection; group 3: gradual strategy + undiluted injection; group 4: nongradual strategy + undiluted injection). Two radiologists evaluated AP images in a blinded manner using a 5-point scale. Semiquantitative scores, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the hepatic artery and portal vein to the liver parenchyma, and CNR of the hepatic artery to the portal vein were compared between the four groups via Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The differences in transient severe motion (TSM) incidence rates and respiratory artifact scores between the gradual and nongradual groups were calculated via the adjusted the Chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney, respectively. Results: The results of the 5-point scale evaluation showed that respiratory artifacts significantly differed between groups (group 1: 2.56±1.16; group 2: 1.53±0.62; group 3: 2.12±1.08; group 4: 1.79±0.89; P=0.002): groups 2 and 4 had smaller artifacts, and group 2 had the fewest number of artifacts. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the scores for the hepatic artery (P=0.177), portal vein (P=0.214), abdominal aorta (P=0.599), and liver parenchyma (P=0.243) or for the total score (P=0.235). The groups significantly differed terms of portal vein SNR (P<0.001), liver parenchyma SNR (P=0.035), and the CNR of the portal vein to the liver parenchyma (P=0.008). These parameters were optimal in group 2. The incidence of TSM and the respiratory artifact score were significantly higher in the gradual group (groups 1 and 3) compared to the nongradual group (groups 2 and 4). Conclusions: The nongradual breath-holding training strategy combined with an injection rate of 2 mL/s with 50% diluted gadoxetic acid could significantly reduce respiratory artifacts and improve AP image quality.

Indexed as

arterial phase (AP)contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)Gadoxetic acidrespiratory artifactsignal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

Identifiers

PMID41522068
PMCPMC12780713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.