Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522057›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

MMD-Net: a weakly supervised solution for quantification of nonalcoholic fatty liver biopsies.

Ming Yu, Tao Jiang, Hongsheng Zhou, Dean Ta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ming YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-1254
Tao JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8531-1639
Hongsheng ZhouInstitute of Advanced Ultrasonic Technology of National Innovation Center Par Excellence, Shanghai, China.
Dean TaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-4491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects 25% of the global population and is a leading cause of cirrhosis. Although liver biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard, its clinical utility is limited by the labor-intensive Kleiner scoring system. Existing deep learning (DL) solutions face two critical barriers: pathologist-dependent annotations requiring equivalent time to manual assessment, and prohibitive costs for large-scale labeled datasets. The primary objective of this research was to establish a weakly supervised framework using multi-instance learning (MIL) for NAFLD assessment, aiming to reduce the annotation workload for pathologists while developing a clinically applicable diagnostic approach. Methods: This study utilized a hepatocellular pathology dataset published by Heinemann Results: The system achieved exceptional agreement with ground truth, demonstrating quadratic weighted Cohen's κ coefficients of 0.932±0.004 (ballooning), 0.836±0.016 (inflammation), and 0.766±0.029 (steatosis), with mean κ=0.845±0.014. Conclusions: This approach establishes a new paradigm for standardized NAFLD histopathological assessment while eliminating the need for pixel-level annotations. By doing so, it charts a promising path for artificial intelligence (AI)-powered histopathological analysis to standardized NAFLD assessment in clinical practice.

Indexed as

multi-instance learning (MIL)multi-task learning (MTL)NAFLD Activity Score (NAS)Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)weakly-supervised

Identifiers

PMID41522057
PMCPMC12780620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.