ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Interpretable deep learning framework based on contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Histopathological grading is a key prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the clinical application of deep learning models (DLMs) for predicting HCC grading from medical imaging is limited by their black-box nature. We aimed to develop an interpretable DLM, interpretable HCC grading network (iHCG-Net), to predict HCC grading preoperatively using multi-phase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI). Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 370 HCC patients who underwent preoperative CEMRI before curative resection. Based on postoperative pathology, the patients were categorized into high-grade (n=136) and low-grade (n=234) HCC groups. They were then stratified into a training cohort (n=259) and a time-independent validation cohort (n=111). Twenty-three clinical-radiological features were collected for all patients. The iHCG-Net, based on the Concept Bottleneck Model (CBM) framework, first encodes CEMRI images using a DenseNet-121 backbone and then leverages a concept regressor to predict the twenty-three clinical-radiological features for final prediction of HCC histological grade. A feature importance score plot was generated to assess the contribution of each feature to the differential diagnosis. Nine baseline predictive models were developed for comparison. The models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and DeLong's test. Results: iHCG-Net demonstrated strong predictive performance for HCC grading, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.893 in the training cohort and 0.802 in the validation cohort. The model significantly outperformed conventional models, including the clinical-radiological model (CM), radiomics models (RMs), and a clinical-radiomic combined model (CRM) (AUCs: 0.675-0.778, 0.617-0.723; P<0.05). Furthermore, iHCG-Net exhibited performance comparable to that of the DLM (AUCs: 0.920, 0.774; P>0.05), while providing inherent interpretability and mitigating the risk of overfitting. Feature importance analysis identified intratumoral arteries as the most influential feature for predicting HCC grading, with an importance score of 0.213. Conclusions: The iHCG-Net can be a promising interpretable artificial intelligence tool for the preoperative prediction of HCC grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.