ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Development and internal validation of a multimodal nomogram integrating clinical, imaging, and laboratory data to predict malignant brain edema after reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant brain edema (MBE) is a life-threatening complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after reperfusion therapy, often leading to fatal herniation or severe disability. Early identification of patients at high risk for MBE is critical but remains challenging due to limited predictive tools. In this study, we aimed to develop and internally validate a multimodal nomogram integrating clinical, imaging, and laboratory variables to predict MBE after reperfusion in anterior-circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 214 consecutive AIS patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy between 2018 and 2023. After standardizing candidate variables, we performed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic regression with the one-standard-error rule and stratified five-fold cross-validation for variable selection and collinearity handling. Selected variables were entered into a multivariable logistic model to construct the nomogram. Model discrimination [area under the curve (AUC)] and Brier score were evaluated using stratified five-fold out-of-fold predictions. Calibration was assessed by bootstrap resampling (B=1,000) with reporting of calibration slope, intercept, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test P value. Clinical utility was examined using decision curve analysis (DCA) and a clinical impact curve (CIC). Results: MBE occurred in 62 patients (29%). The final model included seven predictors: relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) <40% volume, delay time (DT) >6.0 s volume, infarct growth rate (IGR), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), neutrophil count (N), collateral circulation score (CCS), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Apparent AUC in the modeling cohort was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.93]; five-fold out-of-fold AUC was 0.860. After 1,000-bootstrap optimism correction, AUC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91) with a Brier score of 0.13. The calibration slope was ~0.86, the intercept was near 0, and Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.173. DCA showed net benefit across probability thresholds of 0.10-0.70, and the CIC indicated good identification of high-risk individuals. Conclusions: A LASSO-selected, internally validated nomogram enables early risk stratification and decision support for MBE after reperfusion in AIS. Prospective external validation in independent cohorts is required before clinical adoption to confirm reliability and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.