Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41521935›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026

Learning from orthopaedic complications and adverse events in a district general hospital.

A P Dekker, A Stammer, N Ashwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A P DekkerRoyal Derby Hospital, UK.
A StammerQueens Hospital, UK.
N AshwoodBurton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to determine the learning derived from postoperative complications to reduce the risk of avoidable harm.

methodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained local hospital registry of readmissions for complications was undertaken at a single district general hospital over a 10-year period (November 2014-November 2024). Learning points policy changes were monitored prospectively using audit to determine influence on clinical practice.

resultsThere were 316 elective complications from 22,658 cases (1.4%) and 251 trauma complications from 15,862 cases (1.6%). There were 293 deaths out of the 38,520 total cases (0.76% mortality rate); of these, 16 occurred in elective surgery (0.07% mortality rate) and 241 trauma cases out of 15,852 (rate of 1.6%). The total number of elective cases requiring reoperation was 374. The cases from different hospitals accounted for 41%; there were 251 local trauma cases that required reoperation. The most frequent complication was implant dislocation in 201 cases, which was avoidable in one-third of cases due to technical issues. Most periprosthetic fractures were a late complication secondary to osteoporosis. Discussion of the care of complex cases enabled improved training packages and pathways to manage wound care, infection and the technical aspects of prosthetic joint implantation and fracture fixation for trainee surgeons.

conclusionsThere is a significant resource implication for managing complications that originate from other hospitals. Monitoring complications and mortality helps improve practice and enable reproducible outcomes.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHospitals, DistrictHospitals, GeneralHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionReoperationRetrospective StudiesAdverse eventsComplicationsMortalitySurgical experience

Identifiers

PMID41521935
PMCPMC13130512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.