ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2026
Identification of Heart Transplant Rejection Subtypes With Circulating MicroRNAs.
Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02423070 (Genome Transplant Dynamics), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genome Transplant Dynamics
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Tacrolimus: Toward Personalized Immunosuppression in Heart Transplantation.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Review
- From Signal to Surveillance: Assessing the Role of MicroRNAs in Cardiac Allograft Rejection.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCirculating microRNAs are promising biomarkers of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplantation. The study objective was to assess the characteristics and diagnostic performance of previously identified microRNAs and clinical rejection scores (CRS) in distinct blood samples obtained at the time of an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB).
methodsIn the 5-center, prospective, longitudinal cohort study, GRAfT (Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation), microRNA sequencing was performed on blood samples. The previously identified microRNAs associated with ACR (n=12) and AMR (n=17) were used to fit a logistic regression model to the current cohort, and the scores were scaled from 0 to 100. Diagnostic performance of ACR and AMR microRNA panels was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. An adjusted Cox proportional hazard model evaluated the effect of CRS on long-term outcomes.
resultsIn 173 heart transplant recipients (29% female sex, 41% Black race, median follow-up 374 days after transplant), 922 blood samples were sequenced, 720 paired with EMB. Among 14 episodes of ACR, the median ACR CRS was 78 compared with 42 without ACR,
conclusionsCirculating microRNAs reliably identified ACR and AMR on EMB. An elevated microRNA CRS was associated with an increased risk of subsequent rejection, allograft dysfunction, or death. This biomarker, with further validation, can serve as a noninvasive test to screen and diagnose ACR and AMR without the need for an EMB. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02423070.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.