ArticlePalliative & supportive care2026
A formative evaluation of a brief intervention on meaning-making in the re-entry phase after curative cancer treatment.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients in the re-entry phase (that is, the first 18 months after curative cancer treatment) may use meaning-making to deal with existential concerns imposed by cancer and related changes in life. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a formative evaluation of an intervention aimed at supporting patients' meaning-making process and motivating them to pick up life during the re-entry phase.
methodsPatients were included after finishing systemic treatment for breast cancer or melanoma. The intervention comprised a single one-hour conversation guided by a spiritual counselor who explored patients' sources of meaning, in order to support them in dealing with existential concerns and changes in life in the re-entry phase. The evaluation included semi-structured interviews concerning the intervention and questionnaires assessing mental adjustment to cancer, psycho-spiritual wellbeing and meaning in life.
resultsQualitative interviews with 14 participants demonstrated an overall positive experience and appreciation of the intervention. Patients reported several benefits: reflection on existential concerns and sources of meaning, validation of sources of meaning, insights regarding the use of sources of meaning, and motivation to pick up life; and to a lesser extent: prioritizing, identifying meaningful goals, or undertaking specific action. Patients made suggestions on how to tailor the intervention more to their needs. Quantitative data showed increases on the subscales autonomy, goal-orientedness, and fairness of life with small effect sizes. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
resultsThis study showed that an intervention to support patients with breast cancer or melanoma in the process of meaning-making in the re-entry phase after systemic treatment was positively experienced and well appreciated. It supported meaning-making, particularly through reflection on, validation and utilization of sources of meaning, and supporting motivation to pick up life. The results of the current study can be used to optimize the intervention, which can be further evaluated in a multicenter study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.