ArticleCancer medicine2026
Development of a Culturally Sensitive Intervention for Cervical Cancer Screening Promotion for Latinx Transgender Individuals.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTrans men and non-binary people face some of the most challenging cancer health disparities. Primary care physicians could play a key in addressing these, but many clinicians' lack the necessary skill to discuss cervical screening with trans people as these are not routinely taught in medical school. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop an intervention to foster medical students' skills for cervical cancer screening and to examine its initial impact and feasibility.
methodsOur research team is comprised of academic researchers, clinicians, and community members. Together, we developed a 2-h intervention which we implemented using Standardized Patient Simulations (TM actors portraying the role of a TM patient) to observe provider behaviors (general care behaviors, gender affirming behaviors and cervical cancer preventive behaviors) and self-reported measures to examine study outcomes. The total sample consisted of 37 third-year medical students. Welch's t-test was used to compare the intervention effects on all outcomes.
resultsResults suggest the intervention had medium to large effects on all examined behaviors. Behaviors improved in the experimental group compared to the control group and all changes were statistically significant. In general, the intervention was seen as feasible and appropriate with participants mentioning it was "very helpful" and emphasizing the importance of discussing trans health care as part of their medical training as this improves their "confidence." DISCUSSION: Although the sample size was small, results show a potentially promising intervention. We provide an overview of the content of the intervention and discuss future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.