ArticleNucleic acids research2026
SVCROWS: a user-defined tool for interpreting significant structural variants in heterogeneous datasets.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- dicast: a machine learning method for accurate structural variant detection from short-read sequencing data.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Replication stress increases de novo CNVs across the malaria parasite genome.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Replication stress increases de novo CNVs across the malaria parasite genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic structural variants (SVs) are pervasive and can impose major phenotypic impacts. However, it is difficult to appreciate the individual significance of SVs when they are heterogeneously positioned across a genomic neighborhood. Further, ubiquitous variance in SV calling accuracy complicates SV counting and downstream analysis. Tools exist to simplify SV datasets, but they are not suited for all applications. Here, we present a new SV merger, SVCROWS: Structural Variation Consensus with Reciprocal Overlap and Weighted Sizes. This option-rich merger summarizes SV regions using a size-weighted reciprocal overlap framework, accounting for skewed impacts of variable-length SVs. User input directs stringency, enabling various levels of resolution in complex genome regions that harbor a spectrum of SV sizes. Further, by optimizing SVCROWS parameters, the user can tailor results to their study system. When compared to other SV merging programs, SVCROWS maintained accuracy and conserved rare genotypes from both simulated and real-world datasets. Visualization of merger output was critical for identifying how some algorithms derived erroneous conclusions while SVCROWS remained reliable, especially in complex regions. Overall, the novel SVCROWS algorithm presents an improved framework for SV interpretation; its intuitive nature and generalizability facilitate its application to virtually any workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.