Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41521662›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

SVCROWS: a user-defined tool for interpreting significant structural variants in heterogeneous datasets.

Noah Brown, Charles Danis, Vazira Ahmedjanova, Jennifer L Guler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noah BrownDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville VA 22903, United States.
Charles DanisDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville VA 22903, United States.
Vazira AhmedjanovaDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville VA 22903, United States.
Jennifer L GulerDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia. Charlottesville VA 22903, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6301-4563

Funding

The evolution of copy number variations in the AT-rich Plasmodium genomeR01AI150856 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GULER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01AI150856National Science Foundation Expand Fellowship 2021791NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150856NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic structural variants (SVs) are pervasive and can impose major phenotypic impacts. However, it is difficult to appreciate the individual significance of SVs when they are heterogeneously positioned across a genomic neighborhood. Further, ubiquitous variance in SV calling accuracy complicates SV counting and downstream analysis. Tools exist to simplify SV datasets, but they are not suited for all applications. Here, we present a new SV merger, SVCROWS: Structural Variation Consensus with Reciprocal Overlap and Weighted Sizes. This option-rich merger summarizes SV regions using a size-weighted reciprocal overlap framework, accounting for skewed impacts of variable-length SVs. User input directs stringency, enabling various levels of resolution in complex genome regions that harbor a spectrum of SV sizes. Further, by optimizing SVCROWS parameters, the user can tailor results to their study system. When compared to other SV merging programs, SVCROWS maintained accuracy and conserved rare genotypes from both simulated and real-world datasets. Visualization of merger output was critical for identifying how some algorithms derived erroneous conclusions while SVCROWS remained reliable, especially in complex regions. Overall, the novel SVCROWS algorithm presents an improved framework for SV interpretation; its intuitive nature and generalizability facilitate its application to virtually any workflow.

Indexed as

GenomicsGenomic Structural VariationSoftwareAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41521662
PMCPMC12784966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.