Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41521627›Full record

ReviewPublic health nutrition2026

Improving food system outcomes with beans, peas and pulses: a prospective mapping review of research in the UK.

Laura Lane, Rebecca Wells, Christina Vogel, Christian Reynolds

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura LaneCentre for Food Policy, https://ror.org/04489at23City St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8067-2051
Rebecca WellsCentre for Food Policy, https://ror.org/04489at23City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Christina VogelCentre for Food Policy, https://ror.org/04489at23City St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-3786
Christian ReynoldsCentre for Food Policy, https://ror.org/04489at23City St George's, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo map the spread of research on legumes, including beans, peas and other pulses; to identify research gaps and opportunities relating to the use of legumes for improved human nutrition, health and environmental outcomes; and to develop a novel method for clarifying research priorities.

designProspective mapping review, identifying and mapping ongoing research (2019-2023) across the value chain.

settingUK. PARTICIPANTS/SAMPLE: Academic research studies in three databases.

resultsFifty ongoing research projects were identified, revealing a focus on the two ends of the value chain: production (twenty-one projects) and consumption (twenty-one projects). Only four projects encompassed the entire value chain from producer to consumer. Research on production includes the role of legumes in crop rotations for soil health and reduced fertiliser use, productivity interventions and improved breeds. Research on consumption includes dietary and health outcomes, predominantly cardiometabolic impacts, and legumes as an alternative protein source. Few projects focused on the middle of the value chain (four projects on product development) with none focused on processing, food service or retail.

conclusionsFurther interdisciplinary projects, linking producers to consumers and with a greater focus on middle-chain actors, are needed. The food processing/manufacturing, food service and retail sectors hold significant power in food systems practice and governance. They play a crucial role in transitioning to a healthier and more sustainable food system. Understanding the drivers and barriers for these food systems actors in increasing production and consumption of beans, peas and pulses is required to inform future food policy and practice.

Indexed as

DietFabaceaeFood SupplyHumansProspective StudiesResearchUnited KingdomFood systemsLegumesMapping reviewPulsesSustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID41521627
PMCPMC12895458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.