Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41521603›Full record

ArticleBalkan medical journal2026

Significance of LEF1, ROR2, Cyclin D1, and DNA Methylation Profiling in the Molecular Classification and Prognosis Prediction of Pediatric Medulloblastoma.

Mehmet Fatih Tekin, Dilek Gül, Nurşah Eker, Adnan Dağçınar, Yaşar Bayri, Fatih Bayraklı, Beste Melek Atasoy, Süheyla Uyar Bozkurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Balkan medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mehmet Fatih TekinDepartment of Pathology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3998-2860
Dilek GülDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0382-8842
Nurşah EkerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7707-3035
Adnan DağçınarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9532-7820
Yaşar BayriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0668-5453
Fatih BayraklıDepartment of Neurosurgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1707-6055
Beste Melek AtasoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1320-9105
Süheyla Uyar BozkurtDepartment of Pathology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-947X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate identification of medulloblastoma molecular subgroups is essential, particularly in settings lacking advanced genomic tools. Conventional markers, such as β-catenin, present significant challenges in reliably detecting the WNT-activated subgroup (WNT-AG). Aims: To evaluate the utility of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1), Cyclin D1, and receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 (ROR2) as immunohistochemical (IHC) markers for molecular subgroup classification and to assess their prognostic significance. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: IHC analysis was performed using LEF1, Cyclin D1, and ROR2. Two distinct LEF1 staining patterns were identified: nuclear (nLEF1) and punctate (pLEF1). A subset of 29 cases, selected based on predefined criteria, underwent EPIC array Methylation analysis. Findings were correlated with recurrence and survival outcomes. Results: Among the 94 cases, 12.8% were WNT-AG, 54.3% were sonic hedgehog-activated subgroup (SHH-AG), and 33.0% were Groups 3 and 4 (G3/4). nLEF1 demonstrated higher specificity and sensitivity for WNT-AG than β-catenin, identifying it as a more reliable diagnostic marker. High pLEF1 expression was strongly associated with SHH-AG. Cyclin D1 positivity was predominantly observed in WNT-AG. While ROR2 did not identify WNT-AG effectively, its absence in Group 3 cases was notable. Prognostic analysis revealed that LEF1 expression patterns correlated with favorable survival outcomes: total LEF1 (tLEF1) and nLEF1 were associated with improved overall survival, whereas pLEF1 and tLEF1 were linked to better progression-free survival. Conclusion: Nuclear LEF1 (nLEF1) is at least as effective as β-catenin in identifying WNT-AG and may serve as a superior diagnostic marker. Cyclin D1 can be used as a complementary marker in WNT-AG detection. ROR2 negativity may indicate G3 tumors, though further studies are warranted to confirm its prognostic value.

Indexed as

Cyclin D1Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1MedulloblastomaReceptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan ReceptorsAdolescentBiomarkers, TumorChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDNA MethylationFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1LEF1 protein, humanLymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan ReceptorsROR2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID41521603
PMCPMC13040109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.